<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CRM Dashboards are misleading</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mercurygrove.com/blog/121/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mercurygrove.com/blog/121</link>
	<description>Follow an application launch from the inside</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jay Godse</title>
		<link>http://mercurygrove.com/blog/121#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Godse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 02:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mercurygrove.com/blog/?p=121#comment-164</guid>
		<description>Ahhh...I see...it has nothing to do with the technology and everything to do with measurement, inappropriate interpolation (pipeline-based prediction), and sales compensation that is not aligned with business interests (bonus proportional to numbers other than profits).  

It is only natural for salespeople to sand-bag their numbers to defend themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhh&#8230;I see&#8230;it has nothing to do with the technology and everything to do with measurement, inappropriate interpolation (pipeline-based prediction), and sales compensation that is not aligned with business interests (bonus proportional to numbers other than profits).  </p>
<p>It is only natural for salespeople to sand-bag their numbers to defend themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Annan</title>
		<link>http://mercurygrove.com/blog/121#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Annan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mercurygrove.com/blog/?p=121#comment-163</guid>
		<description>Its not so much the CRM systems that encourage salespeople to cheat the system, its the analytics - the predictors and charts that say how many contracts will be closed, by whom, and when.

The concept is that salespeople will update the various stages of a sale as it progresses through the "pipeline".  The management team is able to see how much sales they ought to do based on the amount of deals in the pipeline.

But, as salespeople know, negotiations and deals are not all linear and do not all move at the same pace.  So, to avoid "missing targets" salespeople often underestimate the amount of business they are working on so that they are not held accountable for closing business that is in an early stage.  Or they underrepresent the amount of the deal (for the same reason).

So salespeople do not always represent what they are actually working on.

BUT, and here's the problem, even when they enter accurate information, not all sales transactions work the same way, so extrapolating total future sales based on a lot of early stage discussions is consistently incorrect.

I'm not saying its of no value, but its not as good a predictor as many companies expect, and shouldn't be used as the "carrot and whip" for compensating salespeople.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its not so much the CRM systems that encourage salespeople to cheat the system, its the analytics - the predictors and charts that say how many contracts will be closed, by whom, and when.</p>
<p>The concept is that salespeople will update the various stages of a sale as it progresses through the &#8220;pipeline&#8221;.  The management team is able to see how much sales they ought to do based on the amount of deals in the pipeline.</p>
<p>But, as salespeople know, negotiations and deals are not all linear and do not all move at the same pace.  So, to avoid &#8220;missing targets&#8221; salespeople often underestimate the amount of business they are working on so that they are not held accountable for closing business that is in an early stage.  Or they underrepresent the amount of the deal (for the same reason).</p>
<p>So salespeople do not always represent what they are actually working on.</p>
<p>BUT, and here&#8217;s the problem, even when they enter accurate information, not all sales transactions work the same way, so extrapolating total future sales based on a lot of early stage discussions is consistently incorrect.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying its of no value, but its not as good a predictor as many companies expect, and shouldn&#8217;t be used as the &#8220;carrot and whip&#8221; for compensating salespeople.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Godse</title>
		<link>http://mercurygrove.com/blog/121#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Godse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mercurygrove.com/blog/?p=121#comment-162</guid>
		<description>Your application of the Gladwell video to your application domain is interesting...I have a couple of questions:

How do CRM systems encourage salespeople to cheat the system? (I am not a sales person, so this is for my edification).

What, specifically and in your opinion, is it about CRM dashaboards of common CRM products that provide misleading information?

How do CRM dashboards set sales people up to fail?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your application of the Gladwell video to your application domain is interesting&#8230;I have a couple of questions:</p>
<p>How do CRM systems encourage salespeople to cheat the system? (I am not a sales person, so this is for my edification).</p>
<p>What, specifically and in your opinion, is it about CRM dashaboards of common CRM products that provide misleading information?</p>
<p>How do CRM dashboards set sales people up to fail?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
